MarkUs Blog

MarkUs Developers Blog About Their Project

Archive for December, 2014

Tagging Backend

without comments

This blog post will discuss the decisions made surrounding the backend of the Tagging Project.

Database Schema

As this is the initial implementation of the Tagging feature, we strove to keep the schema changes as simple as possible.  MarkUs uses ActiveRecord as the M in MVC, and thus we had to create ActiveRecord migration files to implement changes.

We decided to create a Tags Model which contained the following explicitly declared pieces of information:

  1. name (string)
  2. description (string)
  3. user (string)

and an integer id that is implicitly declared.  Furthermore, we created a groupings_tags association to create a many to many association between groupings and tags.

That migration file explicitly associates and a tag id with a grouping id and adds a index of the two ids that must be unique.

An interesting thing with ActiveRecord migration files, and increased its ease of use, is that each migration file must specify the action being done(creating table, adding an attribute to a table etc) but also the action that must be done to rollback these changes.

In this case, the rollback operations for each files solely consisted of dropping each table(and removing the index for the grouping_tags association).  This made it quite easy to create and edit the schema in subsequent iterations.  Editing the schema file would consist of the rollback command, editing schema file, and re-migrating.

Models

In editing the model files, we only had to create a tag.rb and modify the grouping.rb to reflect the new schema.

Controllers

In creating the tag controllers, we had to split up the logic between a tags_controller.rb and a tags_helper.rb module.

The interesting between the tags_helper module and the tags_controller is that other controllers can include the module and directly call its method.  This is not the case for tags_controller; routes.rb needs to consulted to call its methods.

The methods in the tags_helper modules are used by controllers (e.g. tags, results) whereas methods in tags_controller are called from views.

For example, methods in the controller include index, edit, create, destroy.  The module has methods that do work with groupings and tags, which are needed by the results_controller.

Written by Nathan Chow

December 15th, 2014 at 1:31 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Status Report – December 5

without comments

Chris

This Week:

  • Completed the PDF annotation editor/viewer (i.e. view, load, save, delete)

Next Week

  • Fix an issues from the last pull request.

 

Jakub Subczynski

Final Week

  • renamed methods throughout codebase:
    • Assignment#past_due_date? to #past_all_due_dates?
    • Assignment#what_past_due_date to #section_names_past_due_date
    • Assignment#section_past_due_date?(grouping) to #grouping_past_due_date?(grouping)
  • created Issue #1926 regarding the intended functionality of Assignment#past_all_due_dates? when there the assignment has sections
  • created RSpec tests for:
    • Assignment#grade_distribution_as_percentage
    • Assignment#get_detailed_csv_report

 

Yusi

This week:

  • Updated code about Relation#all
  • Reported some issues

Next time:
Fix

  • https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1924
  • https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1923
  • https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1922
  • https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1920

Nathan

Last Week:

  • have a code fix updating the submissions table to display real associated tags
  • final exams and end of term projects have kept me pretty busy

Next Week

  • Will be done finals Thursday of next week
  • will work on implementing RSpec tests, any remaining features for tagging and writing a blog post

Written by Chris Kellendonk

December 5th, 2014 at 3:52 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

PDFJS Annotations II

with 2 comments

For this term I have been working on replacing the old image based PDF annotation system with a new one that uses the native file format. The new system allows the students and the markers to view PDF files in a much smoother native fashion. As well as allows markers to annotate the PDF files directly in the viewer. I believe the overall user experience has improved as a result of this change.

In order to implement this feature the [PDF.js](https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/) library by Mozilla was used. This library is designed to render PDF files in the browser using only Javascript and HTML5. But was not designed for adding annotations to a PDF file.

This change has been very beneficial for a multitude of reasons:

  1. It has increased the speed of the assignment collection by completely removing the long process of converting each submitted PDF into a series of images.
  2. Allows for a smoother workflow when viewing and annotating PDF’s. There is now support for changing the zoom level, and there are page number controls for navigating through the pages.
  3. It is now resolution independent. It doesn’t matter what resolution the PDF file was saved as, it will always render correctly to fit within the screen nicely. While still allowing the user to zoom in on pages if need be.
  4. Annotations can be drawn directly in the viewer and thus will change with the zoom level of the document. This is beneficial when small images or specific areas need to be annotated.

The main challenge with working on this component was implementing the annotation system on top of the PDF.js library. The main viewer code was largely undocumented so a fair amount of reverse engineering had to be done in order to understand the rendering process and insert the hooks for annotations. The PDF.js library itself was not modified at all during this process, instead hooks were added into the rendering process so that the annotation system could sit on top of PDF.js without being coupled too heavily to the library. This should make it simpler to upgrade to new PDF.js versions as they are released.

Currently the system does not support downloading PDF files to a user’s computer with the annotations rendered in them. They can only be viewed online. An improvement that could be made in the future would be to render these annotations to the actual PDF file before a user downloads them. [Origami-PDF](https://github.com/mobmewireless/origami-pdf/) is a library that may be able to do this.

Overall I think the system works quite well. The annotation system behaves exactly the same as the image annotations so the user experience will be seamless when transitioning from one system to another. Thus a very small learning curve. And having an actual PDF viewer makes it much simpler to navigate through and markup PDF files.

Written by Chris Kellendonk

December 5th, 2014 at 3:26 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Rails 4 Upgrade Notes II

without comments

This term, I have been working on the upgrade from rails 3 to rails 4. The upgrade process consisted of two phases. Firstly, I upgraded MarkUs from rails 3.2 to rails 4.0. Then, I upgraded it from rails 4.0 to rails 4.1. Each phase consisted of some parts that need to be changed by referring to two upgrade guides in Rails 4 Upgrade Notes

Right after each upgrade phase, I ran both unit test and Rspec test. There were many deprecated warnings and errors showing up. In order to make pull requests small, I
ran each test from unit test and Rspec test separately and updated the code.

After all warnings and errors from the tests were fixed, I tested MarkUs manually. There are some issues after the upgrade and need to be fixed.

https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1924
https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1923
https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1922
https://github.com/MarkUsProject/Markus/issues/1920

Also, The following tasks still need to be done.

Extracted Gems
Since many features that were present in earlier versions of Rails were removed from Rails4 itself and extracted to gems, I have added the following Gems in order to make the upgrade process as smooth as possible.

gem ‘actionpack-action_caching’, ‘~>1.0.0’
gem ‘actionpack-page_caching’, ‘~>1.0.0’
gem ‘actionpack-xml_parser’, ‘~>1.0.0’
gem ‘actionview-encoded_mail_to’, ‘~>1.0.4’
gem ‘activerecord-session_store’, ‘~>0.1.0’
gem ‘rails-observers’, ‘~>0.1.1’
gem ‘rails-perftest’, ‘~>0.0.2’

But not all of them are needed in our application. Those gems that are not used in our application should be removed. For more information about what the gems do, Please refer to upgrading to rails 4 page 71.

Since the final exams are approaching, I didn’t have time to finish the above tasks yet. And I will try to finish them after all finals have completed.

Written by Yusi Fan

December 4th, 2014 at 5:49 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

RSpec testing in MarkUs

without comments

My focus for this term has been testing the Assignment model with RSpec. The major components of this testing included:

  1. Migrating existing rake tests to RSpec tests,
  2. Adding additional tests and
  3. Improving the Assignment model itself (through adding additional validations, removing unused methods and improving existing methods).

I have been creating tests for the model using a unit-method approach. This is what is suggested when testing models. I created a separate describe block to test each Assignment method and only that method. Every method should have an associated describe block upon completion of the Assignment model testing. When I finish testing a method, I delete the associated tests from the rake test suite. Therefore, the old Assignment tests should also all be removed by the time all of the RSpec tests are in place. It is worth noting that there are many methods in the Assignment model without tests for them. One should not rely on simply migrating the tests to ensure good test coverage.

I realized early on that, realistically, there is a good chance no one will inspect the coverage of these tests for a long time after I’ve written them. This is why I was very thorough when testing. I focused on the methods one-at-a-time instead of thinking about the amount of work left to keep myself from just speeding through them. My boiled-down process looks something like:

  1. Focus on a method that is in the current test suite.
  2. Inspect the method to see what it does and how it does it.
  3. Create RSpec tests for that method.
  4. Ensure all tests in the old test suite have been covered and remove them.
  5. Commit changes.

I make changes to the method throughout the process if I see anything that could be improved.

I suggest drawing out a diagram of the associations between the models you are working with. Jumping into testing in a new codebase can be a bit daunting and drawing out a rough diagram really helped me understand how the models fit together. In addition, be sure to play around with the application to find where each model matters. It will help create a mental picture of models as you work with them.

I learned RSpec while working on the tests. Here are some useful links I’ve gathered on RSpec testing:

Written by Jakub Subczynski

December 4th, 2014 at 1:05 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Status Report – December 2

without comments

Irene

Last Week:

  • Added test cases to Assignments rspec tests
  • Updated Main Controller functional test
  • Added Marks Spreadsheets quick links to dashboard & colour-coded due dates

This Week:

  • Make some final visual changes in assignment summaries

Tori

Last Week:

  • looking over React tables to determine which need a custom sort
  • custom sort function for grace credits (sort by fractional value remaining/total)
  • small refactoring of last week’s sort functions
  • addressing comments from @david-yz-liu and @houndci on PR #1906

This Week:

  • making the compare functions more general; moving some of the parsing work back into table.js

Bryan

Last Week:

  • Fixed up some of the changes with the Tags view.
  • Moved the Tags view link up to the sub menu. It was previously located in the sub sub menu. Tags are global in scope as opposed to confined to an assignment.
  • Got most of the Results view working. Tags can now be assigned and unassigned from particular submissions. This was done using Ajax to prevent page loads every time a tag is assigned.

This Week:

  • Bug fixes?
  • Finishing up the Tag feature.

Written by Irene Fung

December 2nd, 2014 at 9:50 pm

Posted in Uncategorized