MarkUs Blog

Categorize open issue related to 1.0.0 milestone

Open bugs that are not reproducible anymore:
Issues: 740, 722, 685, 683, 662, 500, 390, 320, 247

Current active issues being worked on:
Issues: 780, 760

Issues related to upcoming UJS change:
Issues: 741, 696, 688, 603, 475

Outstanding Issues:
Issues: 739, 738, 724, 721, 717, 704, 697, 676, 648, 617, 610, 608, 567, 563, 338, 197, 196, 191, 150, 16

Other duplicate/not reproducible issues:
Issues: 288 duplicate of 239

---

Daryn
Status:
-

Next Steps:
-

Road Blocks:
-

Kristian
Status:
- Pushed testcases for issue 293
- Fixed issue 760. Ran a few manual tests and it worked but I have not tried it with large numbers, eg: 50+ submissions

Next Steps:
- Write testcases for #760

Road Blocks:
- I wrote a few functional testcases for #293 but I am not entirely sure how to write functional test cases for #760. When manually testing my changes, I login as admin, assign a few assignments to a TA, login as a TA, mark a few submissions and try changing the Filter attribute to say “Show Unmarked”. I am still looking at ways to translate this kind of scenario into a test case.

Michael
Status:
- Issue #748. Currently still under code review.
- Worked with Jeff to get UJS working. We have remove all related remote functions. See above for related issue numbers. Code is under review and fixing code based on comments.
- Worked on and submitted fix for Issue 781, Issue 500, Issue 678.

Next Steps:
- Continue to work on issues.

Road Blocks:
- Figuring out how xxxx_path works, primarily how the passing of parameters work. From bundle exec rake routes, I get “codeviewer_assignment_submission_result GET /assignments/:assignment_id/submissions/:submission_id/results/:id/codeviewer(.:format)”. Which means it takes 3 parameters, assignment_id, submission_id, and id. However, I just passed assignment_id and it still works. So I need to determine, is it possible to omit parameter and still work or what is going on.

Jeff
Status:
- Doing code review for just submitted ujs branch. Following critique and looking into revamping layout partials.

Next steps:
- Finish more rails 3 tickets after code is merged.

Road Blocks:
- None

Daryn
Status:
- Currently working on issue #98, fixing assignment form to denote with fields are required

Next Steps:
- Complete issue and test.

Road Blocks:
- The translate of the string seems to be a problem since I want to use html to highlight the denoted fields using a red asterisk(*) so I am trying to find a clean way around that. I’m currently just using a string without the translations.

Kristian
Status:
- Still working on issue 760.
- Opened issue 788 – I remember Karen wanted this feature on the Submissions page both for the TA and Admin. I also remember Daryn wanted to work with me on this.

Next Steps:
- Finish coding and testing 760. Start working on 788
- Get feedback from review, make change and ship issue 293

Road Blocks:
- None

Michael
Status:
- Worked on issue 748. Currently under code review.
- Working with Jeff to get UJS working. Currently we are having no luck getting it to work. Issue related to UJS: issue 741, issue 603.
- Working on issue 781. I have working code for this issue. However, I am trying to write a routing test cases for this issue but I have had no luck with assert_recognizes. Because we are doing partial rendering, assert_recognizes doesn’t seem to work.

Next Steps:
- Continue working on UJS.
- Look into ways to write a routing test case for issue 781.

Road Blocks:
- Having issue getting UJS working.

Jeff
Status:
- Working on UJS transfer

Next steps:
- Continue working on UJS.

Road Blocks:
- Things don’t seem to work, unfortunately. Managed to get UJS working in another app, not sure what I’m doing wrong here. Also 373 is literally sapping my life away.